VALIDITY OF GRAYSCALE ULTRASOUND AND RESISTIVE INDEX IN THE DETECTION OF NATURE OF OVARIAN NEOPLASMS BY TAKING HISTOPATHOLOGY AS A GOLD STANDARD

Authors

  • Faiza Akram Associate Professor, Department of Radiology, Ayub Medical College, Abbottabad
  • Azmat Ali Radiology
  • Sumaira Kiani ATH
  • Bibi Asma Bacha Khan Medical Complex Swabi
  • Saima Bibi Paeds ATH
  • Danish Zafar EYE ATH

Abstract

Background: The utility of ultrasound has long been established in the diagnosis of benign and malignant ovarian neoplasms. Ultrasound is a safe and non-invasive imaging modality that has a high sensitivity and specificity. The objective was to determine the validity of grayscale ultrasound and resistive index in the detection of nature of ovarian neoplasms by taking histopathology as a gold standard. Methods: It was Cross-sectional study conducted in department of Radiology, Ayub Teaching Hospital Abbottabad from May 16 to November 30, 2014. Two-hundred-twenty-one female patients in whom an adnexal mass was noted on pelvic ultrasound were included in the study. Results: Out of these 221 patients, malignant ovarian masses were present in 50 (22.62%) patients on grayscale ultrasound. While a resistive index ≤0.6 was found in 56 (25.34%) patients. Over all the sensitivity of grayscale ultrasound was 95% and the specificity was 93.37%. Likewise, the sensitivity and specificity of resistive index were 95% and 90.06% respectively. Conclusion: This study showed the grayscale ultrasound is a sensitive imaging modality for differentiation of benign and malignant ovarian masses.Keywords: Adnexal masses; Ultrasound; Doppler; Resistive Index; Carcinoma; Ovary

Author Biographies

Faiza Akram, Associate Professor, Department of Radiology, Ayub Medical College, Abbottabad

Radiology Department

Azmat Ali, Radiology

AMC

Sumaira Kiani, ATH

Radiology

Bibi Asma, Bacha Khan Medical Complex Swabi

Distt Paediatrician

Saima Bibi, Paeds ATH

Paeds ATH

Danish Zafar, EYE ATH

EYE ATH

References

Pérez-López FR, Chedraui P, Troyano-Luque JM. Peri- and postmenopausal incidental adnexal masses and the risk of sporadic ovarian malignancy: new insights and clinical management. Gynecol Endocrinol 2010;26(9):631–43.

Forstner R, Sala E, Kinkel K, Spencer JA. European Society of Urogenital Radiology. ESUR guidelines: ovarian cancer staging and follow-up. Eur Radiol 2010;20(12):2773–80.

Majeed H, Ramzan A, Imran F, Rehman M. Validity of resistive index for the diagnosis of malignant ovarian masses. J Pak Med Assoc 2011;61(11):1104–7.

Perren TJ, Swart AM, Pfisterer J, Ledermann JA, Pujade-Lauraine E, Kristensen G, et al. A phase 3 trial of bevacizumab in ovarian cancer. N Engl J Med 2011;365(26):2484–96.

Bast RC, Skates S, Lokshin A, Moore RG. Differential diagnosis of a pelvic mass: improved algorithms and novel biomarkers. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2012;22(Suppl 1):S5–8.

Aziz Z, Sana S, Saeed S, Akram M. Institution based tumor registry from Punjab: five year data based analysis. J Pak Med Assoc 2003;53(8):350–3.

Gupta N. Adnexal Masses in Perimenopausal Women: How Effective is Color Flow Mapping and Pulse Doppler Waveform Studies in detecting Malignancy Preoperatively? J South Asian Feder Menopause Soc 2013;1(1):27–33.

Shah D, Shah S, Parikh J, Bhatt C, Vaishnav K, Bala D. Doppler Ultrasound: A Good and Reliable Predictor of Ovarian Malignancy. J Obstet Gynaecol India 2013;63(3):186–9.

Fleischer AC, Lyshchik A, Fishman DA. Contrast-Enhanced Trans vaginal Sono graphy of Ovarian Masses: Potential Role in Early Diagnosis of Ovarian Cancer. In: Saba L, Acharya UR, Guerriero S, Suri JS, editors. Ovarian Neoplasm Imaging. Boston, MA: Springer US, 2013; p. 465–78.

Testa AC, Timmerman D, Van Holsbeke C, Zannoni GF, Fransis S, Moerman P, et al. Ovarian cancer arising in endo metrioid cysts: ultrasound findings. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2011;38(1):99–106.

Brown DL, Doubilet PM, Miller FH, Frates MC, Laing FC, DiSalvo DN, et al. Benign and malignant ovarian masses: selection of the most discriminating gray-scale and Doppler sono graphic features. Radiology 1998;208(1):103–10.

Fleischer A, James A, Millis J, Julian C. Differential diagnosis of pelvic masses by gray scale sono graphy. Am J Roentgenol 1978;131(3):469–76.

Valentin L. Pattern recognition of pelvic masses by gray-scale ultrasound imaging: the contribution of Doppler ultrasound. Ultrasousnd Obstet Gynecol 1999;14(5):338–47.

Timmerman D, Testa AC, Bourne T, Ameye L, Jurkovic D, Van Hols beke C, et al. Simple ultrasound-based rules for the diagnosis of ovarian cancer. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2008;31(6):681–90.

Smorgick N, Maymon R. Assessment of adnexal masses using ultrasound: a practical review. Int J Womens Health 2014;857–63.

Downloads

Published

2020-07-15

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>