OUT COME OF TRIAL OF SCAR IN PATIENTS WITH PREVIOUS CAESAREAN SECTION
AbstractBackground: Medical evidence indicates that 60–80% of women can achieve vaginal delivery after a previous lower segment caesarean section. Proper selection of patients for trial of scar and vigilant monitoring during labour will achieve successful maternal and perinatal outcome. The objective of our study is to establish the fact that vaginal delivery after one caesarean section has a high success rate in patients with previous one caesarean section for non-recurrent cause. Methods: The study was conducted in Ayub Teaching Abbottabad, Gynaecology-B Unit. All labouring patients, during the study period of five years, with previous one caesarean section and between 37 weeks to 41 weeks of gestation for a non-recurrent cause were included in the study. Data was recorded on special pro forma designed for the purpose. Patients who had previous classical caesarean section, more than one caesarean section, and previous caesarean section with severe wound infection, transverse lie and placenta previa in present pregnancy were excluded. Foetal macrosomia (wt>4 kg) and severe IUGR with compromised blood flow on Doppler in present pregnancy were also not considered suitable for the study. Patients who had any absolute contraindication for vaginal delivery were also excluded. Results: There were 12505 deliveries during the study period. Total vaginal deliveries were 8790 and total caesarean sections were 3715. Caesarean section rate was 29.7%. Out of these 8790 patients, 764 patients were given a trial of scar and 535 patients delivered successfully vaginally (70%). Women who presented with spontaneous onset of labour were more likely to deliver vaginally (74.8%) as compared to induction group (27.1%). Conclusion: Trial of vaginal birth after caesarean (VBAC) in selected cases has great importance in the present era of the rising rate of primary caesarean section.Keywords: Caesarean section; Vaginal birth; Caesarean section, Trial.
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. ACOG practice bulletin no. 115: vaginal birth after previous caesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol 2010;116(2 Pt 1):450–63.
Landon MB, Hauth JC, Leveno KJ, Spong CY, Leindecker S, Varner MW, et al. Maternal and perinatal outcome associated with a trial of labor after prior caesarean delivery. N Engl J Med 2004;351(25):2581–9.
Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Birth after Previous Caesarean Birth. Clinical Green-top Guideline No. 45. London: Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists, February 2007. [Internet]. [cited 2016 Jan 10] Available from: https://www.rcog.org.uk/globalassets/documents/guidelines/gtg_45.pdf
Roberts LJ, Beardsworths SA, Trew G. Labor following caesarean section: current practice in the united kingdom. Br J Obstet Gynecol 1994;101(2):153–5.
Joseph GF, Stedman CM, Robichaux AG. Vaginal birth after caesarean section: the impact of patient resistance to a trial of labor. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1991;164(6 Pt 1):1441–4.
Hassan A. Trial of scar and vaginal birth after caesarean section. J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad 2005;17(1):57–61.
Sims EJ, Newman RB, Halsey TC. Vaginal birth after caesarean: to induce or not to induce. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2001;184(6):1122–4.
Rageth JC, Juzi C, Grossenbacher H. Delivery after previous caesarean: a risk evaluation. Swiss Working Group of Obstetric and Gynecologic Institutions. Obstet Gynecol 1999;93(3):332–7.
Hruban L, Janku P, Ventruba P, Paúrová L, Tápalová V, Harastová A, et al.Vaginal birth after previous caesarean section- outcomes analysis 2007-2010. Ceska Gynekol 2012;77(2):127–32.
Melamed N, Segev M, Hadar E, Peled Y, Wiznitzer A, Yogev Y. Outcome of trial of labor after caesarean section in women with past failed operative vaginal delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2013;209(1):49.
Smith GC, Pell JP, Cameron AD, Doubbie R. Risk of perinatal death associated with labor after previous caesarean delivery in uncomplicated term pregnancies. JAMA 2002;287(20):2684–90.
Hibbard JU, Ismail MA, Wang Y, Te C, Karrison T, Ismail MA. Failed vaginal birth after caesarean section: how risky is it? Maternal morbidity. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2001;184(7):1365–71.
Islam A, Ehsan A, Arif S. Murtaza J, Hanif A. Evaluating trial of scar in patients with a history of caesarean section. N Am J Med Sci 2011;3(4):201–5.
Journal of Ayub Medical College, Abbottabad is an OPEN ACCESS JOURNAL which means that all content is FREELY available without charge to all users whether registered with the journal or not. The work published by J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad is licensed and distributed under the creative commons License CC BY ND Attribution-NoDerivs. Material printed in this journal is OPEN to access, and are FREE for use in academic and research work with proper citation. J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad accepts only original material for publication with the understanding that except for abstracts, no part of the data has been published or will be submitted for publication elsewhere before appearing in J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad. The Editorial Board of J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad makes every effort to ensure the accuracy and authenticity of material printed in J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad. However, conclusions and statements expressed are views of the authors and do not reflect the opinion/policy of J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad or the Editorial Board.
USERS are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles, or use them for any other lawful purpose, without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author. This is in accordance with the BOAI definition of open access.
AUTHORS retain the rights of free downloading/unlimited e-print of full text and sharing/disseminating the article without any restriction, by any means including twitter, scholarly collaboration networks such as ResearchGate, Academia.eu, and social media sites such as Twitter, LinkedIn, Google Scholar and any other professional or academic networking site.