Empathy among medical students: A cross-sectional survey
Abstract
Background: Empathy is regarded as one of the leading elements of good physician-patient relationships, having a strong association with improved patient outcomes. It is an aspect of personality, which is considered to be an essential component in the development of interpersonal understanding and in assisting proficiency in communication. Developing empathy among medical students who are going to become tomorrow’s physicians is an important part of medical education. The objective of this study was to measure the mean empathy score of medical students at a private medical college and identify associated factors. Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted from January to June 2018 among 569 medical students at a private medical college in Lahore. Toronto empathy questionnaire (TEQ) was used to determine empathy levels among students. Data was analysed in IBM SPSS-20. Mean TEQ scores were calculated. Independent sample t-test and one-way ANOVA were used to determine association between mean Toronto empathy score and socio-demographic variables, significant at a p-value of <0.05. Results: The age of 569 respondents ranged from 17 to 27 years with a mean of 20.82±1.757. There were 317 (55.71%) females; and 312 (54.8%) were residing at home with parents. The overall mean TEQ score was calculated to be 42.57±7.513. The Cronbach’s alpha was 0.710. There was a significant association between empathy levels and year of study of the respondents (p<0.001), gender (p<0.001) and students’ permanent area of residence (p=0.018). Conclusion: Overall mean TEQ score was found to be 42.57±7.513. Statistically significant difference was found between gender, place of residence, year of study and mean empathy scores. Keywords: Toronto Empathy Questionnaire; Medical students; EmpathyReferences
Paro HBMS, Silveira PSP, Perotta B, Gannam S, Enns SC, Giaxa RRB, et al. (2014) Empathy among Medical Students: Is There a Relation with Quality of Life and Burnout? PLoS ONE 9(4): e94133.
Association of American Medical Colleges. Learning Objectives for Medical Student Education: Guidelines for Medical Schools. Washington, DC: Association of American Medical Colleges; 1998.
Preston SD, de Waal FB. Empathy: Its ultimate and proximate bases. Behav Brain Sci. 2002; 25(1):1-20.
Neumann M, Scheffer C, Tauschel D, Lutz G, Wirtz M, Edelhäuser F. Physician empathy: Definition, outcome-relevance and its measurement in patient care and medical education. GMS Z Med Ausbild. 2012;29(1):11
Hojat M, Reza, M. Empathy in patient care: antecedents, development, measurement, and outcomes. New York: Springer; 2007. P 295
Hickson GB, Clayton EW, Entman SS, Miller CS, Githens PB, Whetten-Goldstein K, et al. Obstetricians' prior malpractice experience and patients' satisfaction with care. JAMA. 1994; 272(20):1583–7
Hickson GB, Clayton EW, Githens PB, Sloan FA. Factors that prompted families to file medical malpractice claims following perinatal injuries. JAMA. 1992;267(10):1359–63
Neumann M, Wirtz M, Bollschweiler E, Mercer SW, Warm M, Wolf J, et al. Determinants and patient-reported long-term outcomes of physician empathy in oncology: a structural equation modelling approach. Patient Educ Couns. 2007;69(1):63–75
Flickinger TE, Saha S, Roter D, et al. Clinician empathy is associated with differences in patient-clinician communication behaviors and higher medication self-efficacy in HIV care. Patient Educ Couns. 2016;99(2):220-2
Hojat M, Louis DZ, Markham FW, Wender R, Rabinowitz C, Gonnella JS. Physicians' empathy and clinical outcomes for diabetic patients. JS Acad Med. 2011; 86(3):359-64
Del Canale S, Louis DZ, Maio V, Wang X, Rossi G, Hojat M, Gonnella JS. The relationship between physician empathy and disease complications: an empirical study of primary care physicians and their diabetic patients in Parma, Italy. JS Acad Med. 2012; 87(9):1243-9
Hojat M, Gonnella JS. Eleven Years of Data on the Jefferson Scale of Empathy-Medical Student Version (JSE-S): Proxy Norm Data and Tentative Cutoff Scores. Medical Principles and Practice. 2015;24(4):344-350
Jones R. Declining altruism in medicine: understanding medical altruism is important in workforce planning. BMJ. 2002;324(7338):624
Lown BA, Chou CL, Clark WD, Haidet P, White MK, Krupat E, et al. Caring attitudes in medical education: perceptions of deans and curriculum leaders. J Gen Intern Med. 2007;22(11):1514–22
Imran N, Awais Aftab M, Ijaz Haider I, Farhat A. I Educating tomorrow’s doctors: A cross sectional survey of emotional intelligence and empathy in medical students of Lahore. Pak J Med Sci. 2013;29(3):710-14
Ayub A, Khan RA. Measuring empathy of medical students studying different curricula; a causal comparative study. J Pak Med Assoc. 2017;67(8):1238-41
Batt-Rawden SA, Chisolm MS, Anton B, Flickinger TE. Teaching empathy to medical students: an updated, systematic review. Acad Med. 2013;88:1171–77
Spreng RN, McKinnon MC, Mar RA, Levine B. The Toronto Empathy Questionnaire: Scale development and initial validation of a factor-analytic solution to multiple empathy measures. J Personality Assessment 2009;91(1)62–71.
Tavakol M, Dennick R. Making sense of Cronbach’s alpha. Int J Med Educ 2011;2(53):53-5.
Youssef FF, Nunes P, Sa B, Williams S. An exploration of changes in cognitive and emotional empathy among medical students in the Caribbean. International Journal of Medical Education. 2014;5:185-192
Hasan S, Al-Sharqawi N, Dashti F, AbdulAziz M, Abdullah A, Shukkur M et al. Level of empathy among medical students in Kuwait University, Kuwait. Med Princ Pract 2013;22:385–389
Hosseini MK, Hosseini ZK, Mahmmodian F. Comparison of empathy score among medical students in both basic and clinical levels.J Adv Med Educ Prof 2014; 2(2): 88–91.
Ayub A, Khan RA. Measuring empathy of medical students studying different curricula; a causalcomparative study. J Pak Med Assoc 2017;67(8):1238-41.
Haque M, Lutfi SN, Othman NS, Lugova H, Abdullah SL. Empathy level among the medical students of the National Defence University of Malaysia consuming Toronto empathy scale. Acta Med Int 2018;0:1-7.
Stefanovic MP, Dunjic- Kostic B, Gligorc M, Lackovic M, Damjanovic A, Ivkovic M. Empathy predicting career choice in future physicians. Engrami 2015;37:37-48.
Bangash AS, Ali NF, Shehzad AH, Haqqi S. Maintenance of empathy levels among first and final year medical students: a cross sectional study. F1000 Res 2013; 2:157.
Hojat M, Gonnella JS, Mangione S, Nasca TJ, Magee M. Psysician empathy in medical education and practice: experience with The Jefferson Scale of Physician Empathy.Semin Integr Med 2003;1:25-41.
Published
Issue
Section
License
Journal of Ayub Medical College, Abbottabad is an OPEN ACCESS JOURNAL which means that all content is FREELY available without charge to all users whether registered with the journal or not. The work published by J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad is licensed and distributed under the creative commons License CC BY ND Attribution-NoDerivs. Material printed in this journal is OPEN to access, and are FREE for use in academic and research work with proper citation. J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad accepts only original material for publication with the understanding that except for abstracts, no part of the data has been published or will be submitted for publication elsewhere before appearing in J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad. The Editorial Board of J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad makes every effort to ensure the accuracy and authenticity of material printed in J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad. However, conclusions and statements expressed are views of the authors and do not reflect the opinion/policy of J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad or the Editorial Board.
USERS are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles, or use them for any other lawful purpose, without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author. This is in accordance with the BOAI definition of open access.
AUTHORS retain the rights of free downloading/unlimited e-print of full text and sharing/disseminating the article without any restriction, by any means including twitter, scholarly collaboration networks such as ResearchGate, Academia.eu, and social media sites such as Twitter, LinkedIn, Google Scholar and any other professional or academic networking site.
