LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY IN THE ELDERLY PATIENTS. AN EXPERIENCE AT LIAQUAT UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL JAMSHORO
Abstract
Background: Advancing age with its associated co-morbidities increases the likelihood ofpostoperative complications as well as conversion rate during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Recentstudies have also questioned efficacy of this procedure in geriatric patients. The present study assessesthe safety and applicability of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in geriatric patients. The objective of thepresent study was to asses safety and applicability of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the elderlypatients of 65 years and above. Methods: This is a prospective analysis of 173 patients, over 65 yearsof age, who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy from December 2002 to November 2006 atLiaquat University Hospital, Jamshoro. Patients presenting with complicated and uncomplicatedgallstone disease were included in the study population and all of them were operated laparoscopically.The data included demographic details, co-morbidities, underlying biliary pathology, indications forsurgery, operative and postoperative complications, morbidity and mortality, and hospital stay. Thestatistical analysis of the data performed on SPSS version 10. Results: Laparoscopic cholecystectomyundertaken in 173 elderly patients with a mean age of 69.72 years, out of whom 52 (30.05%) weremales and 121 (69.94%) were females. Co-morbid conditions were identified in 53.17% (n=92)patients and included hypertension in 38 patients (21.96%), Diabetes Mellitus in 23 patients (13.29%),COPD in 19 (10.98%) patients, Coronary artery disease in 9 (5.20%) and cardiac arrhythmias in 3(1.73%) patients. Indications for surgery included simple biliary colic in majority of patients (69.94%)and complicated stone disease in 52 (30.05%) subjects. There were 37 (21.38%) emergencylaparoscopic cholecystectomies and 136 (78.61%) patients were operated electively. Mean operativetime was 100 minutes with a SD 29.03. Fourteen (8.09 %) patients required conversion to OC (OpenCholecystectomy) due to various reasons. Mean hospital stay was 6.28 days. Overall 23 (13.29 %)patients developed postoperative complications. One patient died of acute MI on 2nd postoperative day.Conclusion: There is no undue risk in laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the elderly population and theprocedure can be regarded as safe as in patients below 65 years of age.Key words: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy, Geriatric population, Morbidity.References
Evers BM, Townsend CM, Thompson JC. Organ physiology
of aging. Surg Clin North Am. 1994;74:23–39.
Wherry DC, Marohn MR, Malanoski MP, Hetz SP, Rich
NM. An external audit of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in
the steady state performed in medical treatment facilities of
the department of defence. Ann Surg.1996; 224:145–54.
Ishizaki Y, Miwa K, Yoshimoto J, Sugo H, Kawasaki S.
Conversion of elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy to open
cholecystectomy between 1993 and 2004. Br J Surg.
;93:987–91.
Connor S, Garden OJ. Bile duct injury in the era of
laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br J Surg. 2006;93:158–68.
Soper NJ, Stockman PT, Dunnegan DL, Ashley SW.
Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: The new “Gold Standard”?
Arch Surgery1992;127:917–23.
Behrman SW, Melvin WS, Babb ME, Johnson J, Ellison EC.
Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in geriatric population. Am
Surg.1996;62(5):386–90.
Magnuson TH, Ratner LE, Zenilman ME, Bender JS.
Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: Applicability in the geriatric
population. Am. Surg.1997;63(1):91–6.
Margiotta SJ, Horvitz JR, Willis IH, Wallack MK.
Cholecystectomy in the elderly. Am J Surg: 1988;156:509–12.
Tambyraja AL, KumarS, Nixon SJ. Outcome of laparoscopic
cholecystectomy in patients 80 years and older. World J Surg
;28:151–6.
Pessaux P, Tuech JJ, Derouet N, Rouge C, Regenet N,
Arnaud JP. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the elderly: A
prospective study. Surg Endosc 2000;14:1067–9.
Maxwell JG, Tyler BA, Rutledge R, Brinker CC, Maxwell
BG, Covington DL. Cholecystectomy in patients aged 80
years and older. Am J Surg;1998;176:627–31.
Chousleb Mizrahi E, Tousle Kalach A, Shuchleib Chaba S.
Actual status of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Rev
Gastroenterol Mex. 2004;69 Suppl 1:28–35.
Brunt LM, Quasebarth MA, Dunnegam DL, Soper NJ.
Outcome analysis of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the
extremely elderly. Surg Endosc. 2001;15(7):700–5.
Koivusalo AM, Lindgren I. Effects of carbon dioxide
pneumoperitoneum for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Acta
Anasthesiol Scand 2000;44:834–41.
Peters JH, Ellison EC, Innes JT, Liss JL, Nichols KE,
Lomano JM, et al. Safety and efficacy of laparoscopic
cholecystectomy. Ann Surg 1991;213:3–12.
de Costa A. Teaching Gall bladder surgery. Remembrance of
things, past or defensive cholecystectomy revisited. Aust N Z
J Surg 1999;69:834–6.
Korolija D, Sauerland S, Wood-Dauphinée S, Abbou CC,
Eypasch E, Caballero MG, et al. Evaluation of quality of life
after laparoscopic surgery. Evidence-based guidelines of the
European Association for Endoscopic Surgery. Surg Endosc
;18:879–97.
Ros A, Gustafsson L, Krook H, Nordgren CE, Thorell A,
Wallin G, et al. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus mini
laparotomy cholecystectomy; a prospective randomized,
single-blind study. Ann Surg. 2001;234:741–9.
Fleming WR, Michell I, Douglas M, Audit of outpatient
laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Aust NZ J Surg 2000;(70):423-7.
Brune IB, Schonleben K, Omran S. Complications after
laparoscopic and conventional cholecystectomy: a
comparative study. HPB Surg 1994;8(1):19–25.
Saxe A, Lavson J, Philips E. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in
patients aged 65 or older. J Laparoendosc Surg 1993;3(3):215–9.
Massie MT, Massie LB, Marrangoni AG, D'Amico FJ, Sell
HW Jr. Advantages of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the
J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad 2007;19(4)
elderly and in patients with high ASA classifications. J
Laparoendosc Surg 1993;3(5):467–75.
Lo CM, Lai EC, Fan ST, Liu CL, Wong J. Laparoscopic
cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis in the elderly. World
J Surg. 1996;(20):983–7.
Fried GM, Clas D, Meakins JL. Minimally invasive surgery in
the elderly patients. Surg Clin North Am. 1994;74(2):375–87.
Tagle FM, Lavergne J, Barkin JS, Unger SW. Laparoscopic
cholecystectomy in the elderly. Surg Endosc 1997;11:636–8.
Godacz TR. U.S. experience with laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
Am J Surg 1990;165:450–4.
Annamaneni RK, Moraitis D, Cayten CG. Laparoscopic
cholecystectomy in the elderly. JSLS, 2005;9(4):408–10.
Nenner RP, Imperato PJ, Alcorn CM.. Complications of
laparoscopic cholecystectomy in geriatric population group.
N Y State J Med 1993;92(12):518–20.
Uecker J, Adams M, Skipper K, Dunn E. Cholecystitis in the
octogenarian: is laparoscopic cholecystectomy the best
approach? Am Surg 2001;(67):637–40.
Firilas A, Duke BE, Max MH. Laparoscopic
cholecystectomy in the elderly. Surg Endosc 1996;10:33–5.
Issue
Section
License
Journal of Ayub Medical College, Abbottabad is an OPEN ACCESS JOURNAL which means that all content is FREELY available without charge to all users whether registered with the journal or not. The work published by J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad is licensed and distributed under the creative commons License CC BY ND Attribution-NoDerivs. Material printed in this journal is OPEN to access, and are FREE for use in academic and research work with proper citation. J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad accepts only original material for publication with the understanding that except for abstracts, no part of the data has been published or will be submitted for publication elsewhere before appearing in J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad. The Editorial Board of J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad makes every effort to ensure the accuracy and authenticity of material printed in J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad. However, conclusions and statements expressed are views of the authors and do not reflect the opinion/policy of J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad or the Editorial Board.
USERS are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles, or use them for any other lawful purpose, without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author. This is in accordance with the BOAI definition of open access.
AUTHORS retain the rights of free downloading/unlimited e-print of full text and sharing/disseminating the article without any restriction, by any means including twitter, scholarly collaboration networks such as ResearchGate, Academia.eu, and social media sites such as Twitter, LinkedIn, Google Scholar and any other professional or academic networking site.
