EFFECTS OF LONG-TERM USE OF TOBACCO ON TASTE RECEPTORS AND SALIVARY SECRETION
AbstractBackground: Most of the methods of tobacco use are linked to the mouth, where the taste receptors, a primary site for stimulation of salivary secretion, are constantly exposed to tobacco. The main purpose of this study was to observe the effects of long-term use of tobacco on taste receptors and salivary flow rates. Methods: Subjects of the study were divided into smokers, pan, (tobacco-betel-lime quid) chewers, niswar (moist oral snuff) dippers and non-tobacco users as controls. Each group was comprised of 20 healthy male adults. The saliva of each subject was collected under resting condition and following application of crude nicotine and citric acid solutions to the tip of his tongue. Results: The appreciation of taste sensations perceived by each subject of each group was different for nicotine (bitter unpleasant burning sensations) than citric acid (sour burning sensations) but no subjective difference was observed among the corresponding groups. After stimulation with both nicotine and citric acid, all subjects of each group showed a significant rise (p<0.05) in their salivary flow rates but the increase was highly significant (p<0.005) in pan chewers only. Conclusion: We found that the taste receptors response and salivary flow rates of tobacco users were not much different from that of non-tobacco users. Therefore, we conclude that long-term use of tobacco does not adversely affect the taste receptors response and hence salivary secretion.Keywords: Tobacco, taste receptors, Saliva
Jaffe JH. Drug Addiction and Drug Abuse, In: Gilman AG, Goodman LS, Ral, TW, Murad F (Eds). The Pharmacological Basis of Therapeutics. New York MacMillan Publishing Co.1985:532-81.
Larson PS, Haag HB, Silvette H. Tobacco, Experimental and Clinical Studies. Baltimore. The Williams and Wilkins Company 1961.
Heintz U. Secretion rate, buffer effect and number of lactobacilli and streptococcus mutans of whole saliva of cigarette smokers and non-smokers. Scand J Dent Res 1984; 1: 294-301.
Parvinen T. Stimulated Salivary flow rate, pH and lactobacillus and yeast concentrations in non-smokers and smokers. Scand J Dent Res 1984; 92: 315-8.
Pavia DL, Lampman GM, Kriz Jr GS. Introduction to Organic Laboratory Techniques. A Contemporary Approach. Philadelphia W B Saunders Company., 1976: 46-54.
Chaudary SM. Introduction to Statistical Theory (Part 2). Ilmi Kitab Khana. Lahore. 1985: 167-206.
Ganong WF. Review of Medical Physiology. Medical Books/McGraw-Hill Medical Publishing Division. 2001: 714-6.
Schneyer LH, Pigman W, Hanana L, Gilmore RW. Rate of flow of human parotid, sublingual and sub-maxillary secretions during sleep. J Dent Res 1956;35:109-14.
Schneyer LH, Young JA, Schneyer CA. Salivary secretion of electrolytes. Physiol Rev 1972; 52: 720-77.
Jones CJ, Wilson SM. The effect of automatic agonists and nerve stimulation on protein secretion from the rat submandibular gland. J Physiol 1985;385:65-73.
Engstom MD, Fredholman BB, Larsson O, Lundberg JM, Saria A. Autonomic Mechanisms underlying capsaicin induced oral sensations and salivation in man. J Physiol 1986;373:87-96.
Won S, Kho H, Kim Y, Chung S, Lee S. The effect of age on taste sensitivity. Arch Oral Biol 2001;46:619-24.
Dawes C, O’Connor AM, Aspen JM. The effect on human salivary flow rate of the temperature of a gustatory stimulus. 2000; 45: 957-61.
Oster RH, Prouth LM, Shipley ER, Pallack BR, Bradley JE. Human buffering rate measured in situ in response to an acid stimulus found in some common beverages. J Appl Physil. 1953-1954; 6: 348-54.
Cooper RM, Bilash I, Zubek JP. The effect of age on taste sensitivity. J Gerontol 1959;14: 56-8.
Reddy MS, Naik SR, Bagga OP, Chuttani HK. Effect of chronic tobacco-betel-lime “quid” chewing on human salivary secretions. Am J Clin Nutr 1980;33:77-80.