ROLE OF CRANIAL COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY IN PREDICTING CLINICAL OUTCOME IN PATIENTS WITH MINOR HEAD INJURY

Authors

  • Tayyaba Afzal
  • Faiza Akram
  • Misbah Durrani

Abstract

Background: Optimal management of patients with mild head injury in the emergency department is still under debate. The objective of this study was to determine the diagnostic efficacy of computed tomography in patients with minor head injury. Methods: A cross-sectional comparative study was conducted in the Radiology department of PIMS, Islamabad in collaboration with neurosurgery department from 14 February to 13 August 2008. One hundred and sixty patients coming to accident and emergency department with minor head injury with GCS of 13–15 were included. The patients then underwent non contrast enhanced CT of brain within 6 hours and results of computed tomography were compared with clinical outcome determined at 24 hours. Results: Twenty-two patients were CT positive for intracranial injury. Out of these 18 patients had an adverse clinical outcome and were considered true positive, while 4 patients were false positive and had normal clinical course with observation only. Ninety-four patients were CT negative for intracranial injury. Out of these 93 were true negative while 1 was false negative, as confirmed subsequently by adverse clinical outcome. The sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values and diagnostic efficacy of CT for intracranial injury in patients of minor head injury  was 94%, 96%, 81%, 99% and 95.7% respectively. Conclusion: CT should be used as a primary screening investigation in all patients with minor head injury as patients with normal neurological examination and normal CT scan can be safely discharged without need for inpatient or patient observation, thereby making the hospital resources available for more serious patients.Keywords: Intracranial injury, Computed tomography, Diagnostic efficacy, Minor head injury

References

Siddiqui A A, Zafar H, Bashir HS. An audit of head trauma care and mortality. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak 2004;14:173–7.

Jooma R, Ahmad S, Zarden AM. Comparison of two surveys of head injured patients presenting during a calendar year to an urban medial centre 32 years apart. J Pak Med Assoc 2005;55:530–2.

Janett B, MacMillan R. Epidemiology of Head Injury. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1981;282:101–4.

Chesnut RM. Head Trauma. In: Greenfield LJ, Mulholland MW, Oldham KT, Zelenock GB, (Eds). Surgery Scientific Principles and Practice. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 1993. p. 267–72.

Saboori M, Ahmadi J, Farajzadegan Z. Indications for brain CT scan in Patients with minor head injury. Clin Neurol Neurosug 2007;109:399–405.

Turedi S, Hasanbasoglu A, Gunduz A, Yandi M. Clinical decision instruments for CT scan in minor head trauma. J Emerg Med 2008;34:253–9.

af Geijerstam JL, Oredson S, Britton M; OCTOPUS Study Investigators. Medical outcome after immediate computed tomography or admission for observation in head injury: randomized control trial. BMJ 2006;333:465.

Stiell IG, Wells GA, Vandemheen K, Clement C, Lesiuk H, Laupacis A, et al. The Canadian CT Head Rule for patients with minor head injury. Lancet. 2001;357:1391–6.

Miller EC, Holmes JF, Derlet RW. Utilizing clinical factors to reduce head CT scan ordering for minor head trauma patients. J Emerg Med 1997;15:453–7.

Fabbri A, Servadei F, Marchesini G, Morselli Labate AM, Dente M, Iervese T et al. A. Prospective validation of a proposal for diagnosis and management of patients attending the emergency department for mild head injury. J Neurol Neurosug Psychiatry 2004;75:410–6.

Jagoda AS, Bazarian JJ, Bruns JJ Jr, Cantrill SV, Gean AD, Howard PK, et al. Clinical policy: Neuroimaging and decision making in adult traumatic brain injury in the acute setting. J Emerg Nurs 2009;35(2):e5–40.

Stein SC, Ross SE. The value of computed tomographic scans in patients with low-risk head. Neurosurgery 1990;26:638–40

af Geijerstam J-L, Britton M. Mild head injury—mortality and complication rate: meta-analysis of findings in a systemic literature review. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2003;145:843–50.

McDonald CM, Jaffe KM, Fay GC, et al. Comparison of indices of traumatic brain injury severity as predictors of neurobehavioral outcome in children. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1994;75(3):328–37.

Teasdale G Jennett B. Assessment of coma and impaired consciousness. A practical scale. Lancet. 1974;2(7872):81–4.

Jagger J, Fife D, Vernberg K, Jane JA. Effect of alcohol intoxication on the diagnosis and apparent severity of brain injury. Neurosurgery. 1984;15(3):303–6.

Pal J, Brown R, Fleiszer D. The value of the Glasgow Coma Scale and Injury Severity Score: predicting outcome in multiple trauma patients with head injury. J Trauma. 1989;29(6):746–8

Waxman K, Sundine MJ, Young RF. Is early prediction of outcome in severe head injury possible? Arch Surg 1991;126(10):1237–41.

Vollmer DG. Prognosis and outcome of severe injury. In: Cooper PR, (Ed). Head Injury. 3rd ed. Baltimore: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins;1993.p. 533–81.

Langfitt TW, Gennarelli TA. Can the outcome from head injury be improved? J Neurosurg 1982;56(1):19–25.

Davis PC. Head trauma. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2007;28:1619–21.

Valadka AB, Ward JD, Smoker WRK. Brain Imaging in Neurologic Emergencies. In: Prough DS, Traystman RJ, (Eds). Critical Care: State of the Art. Vol 14. Anaheim, Ca: Society of Critical Care Medicine;1993:1–60.

Langfitt TW, Gennarelli TA. Can the out come from head injury be improved? J Neurosurg 1982;56(1):19–25.

Livingston DH, Loder PA, Koziol J, Hunt CD. The use of CT scanning to triage patients requiring admission following minimal head injury. J Trauma 1991;31(4):483–7; discussion 487–9.

Shackford SR, Wald SL, Ross SE, Cogbill TH, Hoyt DB, Morris JA, et al. The clinical utility of computed tomographic scanning and neurologic examination in the management of patients with minor head injuries. J Trauma. 1992;33:385–94.

Tong KA, Oyoyo U, Holshouser BA, Ashwal S. Neuroimaging for traumatic brain injury. In Edina LS, Blackmore CC, (Editors). Evidence based imaging. Optimizing imaging in patient care. New York; Springerlink; 2006.233–59.

Livingston DH, Lavery RF, Passannante MR, Shurnik JH, Baker S, Fabian TC, et al. Emergency department discharge of patients with a negative cranial computed tomography scan after minimal head injury. Ann Surg 2000;232(1):126–32.

Shackford SR, Wald SL, Ross SE, Cogbill TH, Hoyt DB, Morris JA, et al. The clinical utility of computed tomographic scanning and neurologic examination in the management of patients with minor head injuries. J Trauma 1992;33:385–94.

Dacey RG Jr, Alves WM, Rimel RW, Winn RH, Jane JH. Neurosurgical complications after apparently minor head injury. Assessment of risk in a series of 610 patients. J Neurosurg 1986;65:203–10.

Thiruppathy Sp, Muthukumar N. Mild head injury: revisited. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2004;146:1075–82.

Borczuk P. Predictors of intracranial injury in patients with mild head trauma. Ann Emerg Med 1995;25:731–6.

Downloads

Published

2013-06-01

Most read articles by the same author(s)