• Saima Gillani
  • Nasir Hussain Shah Kazmi
  • Shahzad Najeeb
  • Saad Hussain
  • Ali Raza


Background: Congenital anomalies play a significant role in perinatal and neonatal morbidity andmortality. The frequency of these congenital anomalies varies in different populations. Objectiveof this study was to find out the frequencies of congenital anomalies admitted in nursery of AyubTeaching Hospital, Abbottabad. Methods: In this descriptive, cross-sectional study all patientsadmitted in NICU from October 2009 to January 2010 were included. The patients were examinedfor major and minor congenital anomalies. The observations were recorded in tabulated form.Results: A total of 2,360 patients were admitted in NICU during the study period. One hundredpatients were noted to have congenital anomalies. The most frequent anomalies involved thecentral nervous system (31%). Meningomyelocele was the commonest defect (71%, 22 out of 31cases of CNS defects), among these males were more (77%, 17 out of 22 of meningomyelocelecases) than females (14 out of 31). These were followed by patients born with congenital heartdefects (16%). Patients with urogenital anomalies (6%) were all male except for one who hadambiguous genitalia. Conclusions: Cases of meningomyelocele were the commonest presentingcongenital anomaly. More stress should be laid on the role of peri-conceptional vitaminsupplementation like folic acid for the primary prevention of congenital defects.Keywords: congenital anomaly, birth defect, encephalocele, anencephaly, Down’s syndrome, trisomy


Rosano A, Botto LD, Botting B, Mastroiacovo P. Infant mortality

and congenital anomalies from 1950 to 1994: an international

perspective. J Epidemiol Community Health 2000;54:660–6.

Agha MM, William JI, Marrett L, To Tl Dodds L. Detrimants of

survival in children with severe congenital anomalies: A long

term population based cohort study. Birth Defects Res A Clin

Mol Teratol 2006;76:46–54.

Harris JA, James L. State-by-state cost of birth defects-1992.

Tetrology 1997;56:11–6.

Abdi-Rad I, Khoshkalam M, Farrokh-Islamlou HR. The

Prevelance at Birth of OvertCongenital Anomalies in Urmia

Northwestern Iran. Arch Iran Med 2008;11(2):148–51.

Narchi H, Naji KIulayat N. Congenital malformation .Are they

more prevalent in cousin marriages. Ann Saudi Med


Wynshaw-Boris A, Biesecker LG. Dysmorphology. In:

Kliegman RM, Behrman RE. Editors. Nelson text book of

Pediatrics.18th Edition Philadelphia: Saunders; 2007;786–7.

Imaizumi Y, Yamamura H, Nishikawa M, Matsuoka M,

Moriyama I. The prevalence at birth of congenital malformations

at a maternity hospital in Osaka City, 1948–1990. Jinrui

Idengaku Zasshi 1991;36:275–87.

Chen CJ, Wang CJ, Yu MW, Lee TK. Perinatal mortality and

prevalence of major congenital malformations of twins in Taipei

City. Acta Genet Med Gemellol (Roma) 1992;41:197–203.

Evaluation of infant with single or multiple congenital

Anomalies. Guide lines American College of Medical genetics.

Available at:

Asindi AA, Al Hifzi I, Bassuni WA. Major congenital

malformations among Saudi infants admitted to Asir Central

Hospital.Annals of Saudi Medicine 1997;17:250–3.

Lee K, Khoshnood B, Chen L, Wall S, Cromie W, Mittendorf R.

Infant Mortality from Congenital Malformations in the United

States, 1990–97, Obstet Gynaecol 2000;98:620–7.

Mosayebi Z, Movahedian AH, Pattern of congenital

malformations in cosanguineous versus non consanguineous

marriages in Kashan, Islamic republic of Iran. Health J


Abdulrazzaq YM, Bener A, Al-Gazali LI, Al-Khayat AI,

Micallef R, Gaber T. A study of possible deleterious effects of

consanguinity. Clinical Genetics 1997;51:167–73.

Muga RO, Mumah SCJ, Juma PA. Congenital malformations

among newborns in Kenya, Afr J food Agri Nutr Dev




Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>