NEED ASSESSMENT OF TEACHING QUALITATIVE RESEARCH IN UNDERGRADUATE MEDICAL EDUCATION: A MIXED METHOD STUDY
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55519/JAMC-04-11711Keywords:
Need assessment, Undergraduates, Qualitative researchAbstract
Background: Accreditation bodies of medical education globally value competency in research that facilitates evidence-based practice of medicine. Physician-scientists need awareness of qualitative research methods for in-depth exploration of sociocultural, gender, behavioural, emotional, and religious factors affecting health that cannot be gauged by quantitative research methods. The introduction of qualitative research at the undergraduate level can enhance understanding of local populations' unique health needs and strengthen evidence-based practice. Methods: This was a mixed-method study conducted from July to October 2021. Four journals with dedicated student’s corner/student journals were hand-searched for qualitative research articles published by students, over the past five years. Quantitative data was collected at four medical colleges of Khyber-Pakhtunkhwa for several qualitative research projects being conducted by students. Quantitative data was collected from the faculty of these colleges about the facilities of research departments. After analysing quantitative data, five semi-structured interviews via email were conducted about factors limiting qualitative research at medical colleges. Written responses were analysed for themes. Results: There was not a single qualitative research article published by students in local journals in five years. Out of 39 research projects by undergraduates at four medical colleges only one was qualitative. Two themes developed from qualitative data were underdeveloped research departments and a lack of attitude toward qualitative research. Conclusion: There is a felt need and gap to include qualitative research objectives at the undergraduate level, but before that emphasis needs to be placed on providing infrastructure, resources, and trained faculty to facilitate implementation. It will facilitate future doctors to find answers to problems impalpable by quantitative methodsReferences
PMDC. National Accreditation Framework for Medical and Dental Schools in Pakistan-2019. 2019 [Internet]. [cited 2022 Jun 22]. Available from: http://www.pmdc.org.pk/LinkClick.aspx?fileticket=Y6tXgbbhP8c%3D&tabid=429&mid=1101
HEC PA. Curriculum of M.B,B.S 2018 [Internet]. [cited 2022 Jun 22]. Available from: http://pmdc.org.pk/LinkClick.aspx?fileticket=EKfBIOSDTkE%3d&tabid=102&mid=556
WFME. World Federation for Medical Education. Basic Medical Education WFME Global Standards For Quality Improvement 2015. [Internet]. [cited 2022 Jun 22]. Available from: https://wfme.org/publications/wfme-global-standardsfor-quality-improvement-bme/?wpdmdl=831%27;return
Riley SC, Ferrell WR, Gibbs TJ, Murphy MJ, Cairns W, Riley SC, et al. Twelve tips for developing and sustaining a programme of student selected components. Med Teach 2008;30(4):370–6.
Abu-Zaid A. A graduate's perspective on medical student journals. J Postgrad Med 2019;65(3):169–70.
Yang VW. The future of physician-scientists-demise or opportunity? Gastroenterology 2006;131(3):697–8.
Furuya H, Brenner D, Rosser CJ. On the brink of extinction: the future of translational physician-scientists in the United States. J Transl Med 2017;15(1):88.
Permar SR, Ward RA, Barrett KJ, Freel SA, Gbadegesin RA, Kontos CD, et al. Addressing the physician-scientist pipeline: strategies to integrate research into clinical training programs. J Clin Invest 2020;130(3):1058–61.
Houlden RL, Raja JB, Collier CP, Clark AF, Waugh JM. Medical students' perceptions of an undergraduate research elective. Med Teach 2004;26(7):659–61.
Solomon SS, Tom SC, Pichert J, Wasserman D, Powers AC. Impact of medical student research in the development of physician-scientists. J Investig Med 2003;51(3):149–56.
Segal S, Lloyd T, Houts PS, Stillman PL, Jungas RL, Greer RB 3rd. The association between students' research involvement in medical school and their postgraduate medical activities. Acad Med 1990;65(8):530–3.
Al-Busaidi IS, Wells CI, Wilkinson TJ. Publication in a medical student journal predicts short- and long-term academic success: a matched-cohort study. BMC Med Educ 2019;19(1):271.
Metcalfe D. Involving medical students in research. J Royal Soc Med 2008;101(3):102–3.
Naveed A, Sultana F, Parveen S, Jawaad I, Saleem M, Aamer Y. Comparative Study of Competencies of a Fresh Medical Graduate in Pakistan in General and for Forensic Medicine in Specific. Pak J Med Health Sci 2018;12(3):1251–5.
The PME. Qualitative Research: Understanding Patients' Needs and Experiences. PLoS Med 2007;4(8):e258.
Cristancho SM, Goldszmidt M, Lingard L, Watling C. Qualitative research essentials for medical education. Singapore Med J 2018;59(12):622–7.
Iqbal MP. What ails medical research in Pakistan? Role of institutions. Pak J Med Sci 2015;31(6):1287–9.
Povee K, Roberts LD. Qualitative research in psychology: Attitudes of psychology students and academic staff. Aust J Psychol 2014;66(1):28–37.
Barret P, Treves A, Shmis T, Ambasz D, Ustinova M. The Impact of School Infrastructure on Learning A Synthesis of the Evidence. [Internet]. World Bank Publication; 2019. [cited 2021 Jun 20]. Available from: https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/bitstream/handle/10986/30920/9781464813788.pdf?sequence=2&isAllowed=y
World Bank. Why education infrastructure matters for learning [Internet]. 2017 [cited 2022 Jun 22]. Available from: https://blogs.worldbank.org/education/why-education-infrastructure-matters-learning
Akram A, Daud M, Rizwan F, Md Johar MG, Khan R. Structuring Quality Education by Proposing Physical Infrastructure of a Medical School. Educ Med J 2016;8(3):75–87.
Permar SR, Ward RA, Barrett KJ, Freel SA, Gbadegesin RA, Kontos CD, et al. Addressing the physician-scientist pipeline: strategies to integrate research into clinical training programs. J Clin Invest 2020;130(3):1058–61.
Jawaid SA. What ails the Pakistani medical institutions? Pak J Med Sci 2015;31(4):747–50.
Sawatsky AP, Ratelle JT, Beckman TJ. Qualitative Research Methods in Medical Education. Anesthesiology 2019;131(1):14–22.
Lewthwaite S, Nind M. Teaching Research Methods in the Social Sciences: Expert Perspectives on Pedagogy and Practice. Br J Educ Stud 2016;64(4):413–30.
Pfadenhauer LM, Coenen M, Kühlmeyer K, Odukoya D, Schunk M, von Unger H. Teaching Qualitative Research Methods in Public Health and Medicine: a research oriented module. J Med Educ 2018;35(4):1–21.
Additional Files
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Humera Adeeb, Syeda Saima Qamar Naqvi, Ihsan Ullah
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Journal of Ayub Medical College, Abbottabad is an OPEN ACCESS JOURNAL which means that all content is FREELY available without charge to all users whether registered with the journal or not. The work published by J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad is licensed and distributed under the creative commons License CC BY ND Attribution-NoDerivs. Material printed in this journal is OPEN to access, and are FREE for use in academic and research work with proper citation. J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad accepts only original material for publication with the understanding that except for abstracts, no part of the data has been published or will be submitted for publication elsewhere before appearing in J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad. The Editorial Board of J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad makes every effort to ensure the accuracy and authenticity of material printed in J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad. However, conclusions and statements expressed are views of the authors and do not reflect the opinion/policy of J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad or the Editorial Board.
USERS are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles, or use them for any other lawful purpose, without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author. This is in accordance with the BOAI definition of open access.
AUTHORS retain the rights of free downloading/unlimited e-print of full text and sharing/disseminating the article without any restriction, by any means including twitter, scholarly collaboration networks such as ResearchGate, Academia.eu, and social media sites such as Twitter, LinkedIn, Google Scholar and any other professional or academic networking site.
