LEARNING STYLE OF MEDICAL STUDENTS AND ITS CORRELATION WITH PREFERRED TEACHING METHODOLOGIES AND ACADEMIC ACHIEVEMENT
Abstract
Background: Researchers have categorized the learning styles in many ways. Kolb proposed a classification of learner’s styles as convergers, divergers, assimilators and accommodators. Honey and Mumford simplified learning styles as activists, reflectors, theorists and pragmatists. Neil Fleming’s VARK model (Visual, Auditory, Read/write and Kinesthetic) is also popular. This study was carried out to determine the frequency of learning styles (Honey and Mumford) of medical students and its correlation with preferred teaching methodologies and academic achievements. Methods: A total of 77 medical students of 4th year MBBS were selected through non-probability convenient sampling for this study. Honey and Mumford’s learning style questionnaire, and a 2nd questionnaire to know their preference for different teaching methodologies were distributed to the students. Learning styles were identified and correlated with preferred teaching methodologies and academic achievements by Chi-square test. Results: Mean age of the medical students was 22.75±1.05 years. Twenty one (27.3%) participants were males and 56 (72.7%) females. By learning styles, 7 (9.1%) medical students were activists, 36 (46.8%) reflectors, 13 (16.9%) theorists and 21 (27.3%) were pragmatists. Out of 77 students, 22 preferred interactive lectures; 16, small group discussion; 20 problem based learning, 10 preferred demonstration on models. Only 01 students preferred one-way lecture as the best teaching methodology. No significant correlation was found between learning styles and preferred teaching methodologies and learning styles and academic scores. Conclusion: Most of the medical students had reflector (46.8%) and pragmatist (27.3%) learning styles. Majority preferred interactive lectures (28.57%) and problem based learning (25.98%) as teaching methodologies. Aligning our instructional strategies with learning styles of the medical students will improve learning and academic performance.References
Sadler-Smith E. Learning styles and instructional design. Innovat Educ Train Int 1996;33:185–93.
Horner D. Expectations of the student. In: Graves D, editor. The hidden curriculum in business studies. Chichester: Higher Education Foundation; 1983.
Leite WL, Svinicki M, Shi Y. Attempted Validation of the Scores of the VARK: Learning Styles Inventory With Multitrait-Multimethod Confirmatory Factor Analysis Models. Educ Psychol Meas 2010;70(2):323–39.
Pask G. Styles and strategies of learning. Br J Educ Psychol 1976;46:128–48.
Kolb DA. Experiential learning experience as the source of learning and development. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ. 1984.
Honey P, Mumford A. The Manual of Learning Styles. 3rd ed. Maidenhead; Berkshire,UK: Honey Press. 1992.
Newble DI, Entwistle NJ. Learning style and approaches: implications for medical education. Med Educ 1986;20(3):162–75.
Valley K. Learning styles and courseware design. Assoc Learn Tech J 1997;5:42–51.
Mustafa AG, Allouh MZ, Mustafa IG, Hoja IM. Anatomy learning styles and strategies among Jordanian and Malaysian medical students: the impact of culture on learning anatomy. Surg Radiol Anat 2013;35(5):435–41.
Zapalska AM, Dabb H. Learning Styles. J Teach Int Bus 2002;13(3-4):77–97.
Shukr I, Zainab R, Rana MH. Learning styles of postgraduate and undergraduate medical students. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak 2013;23(1):25–30.
Sternberg RJ, Grigorenko EL, Zhang LF. Styles of learning and thinking matter in instruction and ssessment. Perspect Psychol Sci 2008;3(6):486–506.
Rasool GH, Rawaf S. The influence of learning styles preference of undergraduate nursing students on educational outcomes in substance use education. Nurse Educ Pract 2008;8:306–14.
Fleming S, McKee G, Huntley-Moore S. Undergraduate nursing students' learning styles: a longitudinal study. Nurse Educ Today 2011;31(5):444–9.
Slater JA, Lujan HL, DiCarlo SE. Does gender influence learning style preferences of first-year medical students? Adv Physiol Educ 2007;31(4):336–42.
Baykan Z, Nacar M. Learning styles of first-year medical students attending Erciyes University in Kayseri, Turkey. Adv Physiol Educ 2007;31(2):158–60.
Wehrwein EA, Lujan HL, DiCarlo SE. Gender differences in learning style preferences among undergraduate physiology students. Adv Physiol Educ. 2007;31(2):153–7.
Costa ML, van Rensburg L, Rushton N. Does teaching style matter? A randomised trial of group discussion versus lectures in orthopaedic undergraduate teaching. Med Educ 2007;41(2):214–7.
Novak S, Shah S, Wilson JP, Lawson KA, Salzman RD. Pharmacy students' learning styles before and after a problem-based learning experience. Am J Pharm Educ 2006;70(4):74.
Mukhtar F, Hashmi N, Rauf MA, Anzar A, Butt KI, Ahmed M, et al. Teaching methodologies;what is the students’ perspective? Prof Med J 2012;19(5):597–603.
Carrier CA, Newell KJ, Lange AL. Relationship of learning styles to preferences for instructional activities. J Dent Educ 1982;46(11):652–6.
Wilkinson T, Boohan M, Stevenson M. Does learning style influence academic performance in different forms of assessment? J Anat 2014;224(3):304–8.
Shankar PR, Dubey AK, Binu VS, Subish P, Deshpande VY. Learning styles of preclinical students in a medical college in western Nepal. Kathmandu Univ Med J (KUMJ) 2006;4(3):390–5.
Lynch TG, Woelfl NN, Steele DJ, Hanssen CS. Learning style influences student examination performance. Am J Surg 1998;176(1):62–6.
Gurpinar E, Alimoglu MK, Mamakli S, Aktekin M. Can learning style predict student satisfaction with different instruction methods and academic achievement in medical education? Adv Physiol Educ 2010;34(4):192–6.
Wilson ML, "Students' Learning Style Preferences and Teachers' Instructional Strategies: Correlations between Matched Styles and Academic Achievement" (Doctoral Dissertations and Projects). 2011, Paper 468. [Internet] [cited 2015 Jan 15]. Available at: http://digitalcommons.liberty.edu/doctoral/468
Alkhatnai M. Learning Styles of EFL Saudi College-level Students in On-line and Traditional Educational Environments [Internet].2011 [cited 2015 Jan 15]. Available from: https://dspace.iup.edu/handle/2069/341
Published
Issue
Section
License
Journal of Ayub Medical College, Abbottabad is an OPEN ACCESS JOURNAL which means that all content is FREELY available without charge to all users whether registered with the journal or not. The work published by J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad is licensed and distributed under the creative commons License CC BY ND Attribution-NoDerivs. Material printed in this journal is OPEN to access, and are FREE for use in academic and research work with proper citation. J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad accepts only original material for publication with the understanding that except for abstracts, no part of the data has been published or will be submitted for publication elsewhere before appearing in J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad. The Editorial Board of J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad makes every effort to ensure the accuracy and authenticity of material printed in J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad. However, conclusions and statements expressed are views of the authors and do not reflect the opinion/policy of J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad or the Editorial Board.
USERS are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles, or use them for any other lawful purpose, without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author. This is in accordance with the BOAI definition of open access.
AUTHORS retain the rights of free downloading/unlimited e-print of full text and sharing/disseminating the article without any restriction, by any means including twitter, scholarly collaboration networks such as ResearchGate, Academia.eu, and social media sites such as Twitter, LinkedIn, Google Scholar and any other professional or academic networking site.
